What is it?
The selected intervention may be observation, silicone-based care, a medicine, an injectable, a device or surgery; each has its own material and risk profile.
Scar Treatment · Aesthetic Medicine · Istanbul
Scar Treatment · Aesthetic Medicine · Istanbul
A scar is not one diagnosis. Atrophic, hypertrophic, keloid, contracted, pigmented, tethered, symptomatic and actively inflamed scars behave differently; maturity, cause, location and skin type guide the sequence of care.
The aim is a defined change in symptoms, colour, contour, texture or movement. Complete erasure or restoration to normal uninjured skin is not promised.
Quick Orientation
Identity · composition · preparation · route
A responsible discussion identifies the exact preparation or device, how it was made, where it is intended to act and which clinical question is being assessed.
The selected intervention may be observation, silicone-based care, a medicine, an injectable, a device or surgery; each has its own material and risk profile.
For any product or device, formulation, manufacturer, settings or preparation, sterility, maintenance and labelled use are checked separately.
Treatment may act on the surface, within scar tissue, across tethering planes or through surgical revision; route follows the diagnosed scar feature.
Pain, itch, thickness, tethering, colour, contour or restricted movement is selected as the clinical target rather than a promise to remove the scar.
Method Boundary
Scar treatment is a staged plan, not one product
The intended role, product identity and target tissue stay visible so unlike procedures are not presented as one interchangeable class.
What may be considered
What must not be inferred
A scar that is changing rapidly, ulcerated, infected, unusually painful or diagnostically uncertain needs medical assessment before aesthetic treatment.
Medical Suitability
Clinical question before method selection
The scar is examined for morphology, maturity, activity, anatomical tension, skin type, symptoms, previous treatment and the condition that caused it.
Atrophic, rolling, boxcar, ice-pick, hypertrophic, keloid and contracted patterns are not interchangeable.
Age, growth, redness, itch, pain and ongoing inflammation show whether the scar is still evolving.
Acne, surgery, trauma, burn, infection, movement, tension and tethering may alter the plan.
Skin type, keloid tendency, medicines, immune factors and previous pigment change affect suitability.
Symptom control, movement, thickness, colour or contour is prioritised and alternatives are compared.
Product and Treatment Path
Traceability without a public injection recipe
Surface care, injection, energy, release of tethering and surgery act differently. Their materials, wound burden and recurrence risks remain separate.
The scar type, maturity, symptoms, cause and anatomical forces are documented first.
The selected intervention is identified by its material, route, intended tissue and evidence.
Only one justified step is followed through healing before another method is added.
This page does not select a medicine, concentration, injection plan, device setting, depth, surgical technique or combination protocol.
Evidence and Limits
Read the data at product and indication level
Trials use different scar types, scales, devices, medicines and follow-up periods. Improvement in one feature does not mean scar removal.
Evidence for atrophic acne scars does not automatically apply to hypertrophic, keloid, burn or surgical scars.
Pain, thickness, colour, depth and patient-reported appearance are separate endpoints.
New and mature scars may respond differently and recurrence can extend beyond short follow-up.
A multimodal study does not reveal the contribution or safety of every component for every patient.
Available evidence supports selective, staged care; it does not establish one best method or complete, permanent scar disappearance.
Individual Plan
One indication · one traceable intervention · one review point
Baseline morphology, symptoms, function and photographs define the first intervention and the point at which it should be stopped or changed.
Ongoing acne, inflammation, infection or wound problems are addressed before texture-focused treatment.
Pain, itch, thickness, tethering, colour or contour receives a specific endpoint.
Wound care, sun protection and pigment risk are planned around the selected method.
A raised, painful or enlarging scar is not automatically retreated with greater intensity.
Course and Follow-Up
Expected reaction · adverse effect · clinical endpoint
Early redness, crusting or swelling is reviewed separately from later texture, colour, symptom and recurrence outcomes.
Scar type, dimensions, symptoms, movement and standardised photographs are documented.
Increasing pain, heat, discharge, ulceration or spreading redness requires in-person review.
Texture, thickness, colour, pain or movement is measured only after appropriate healing.
Worsening, pigment change, new scarring or recurrence changes the plan rather than triggering escalation.
Risks and Alternatives
Material, anatomy and route shape risk
Risk depends on skin type, scar biology, anatomical site and the selected medicine, device or surgery.
Pain, redness, prolonged healing, infection, ulceration and wound breakdown may occur.
Hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, persistent redness, atrophy or uneven texture may follow treatment.
A larger scar, hypertrophic response, keloid recurrence, contracture or new tethering is possible.
Treatment is withheld or stopped when the indication, consent, safety controls or follow-up cannot support a proportionate plan.
Rapid growth, ulceration, marked pain, discharge, fever or spreading inflammation requires prompt in-person assessment before further scar treatment. Alternatives may include observation, silicone-based scar care, symptom-directed medical treatment, a different device, rehabilitation or surgical review.
Istanbul and Follow-Up
A treatment decision must remain reviewable after travel
International care is not reduced to a treatment day. The in-person examination, exact intervention, early review and later endpoint are connected before departure.
History, previous procedures and the specific scar treatment question prepare the visit without confirming suitability.
Anatomy, tissue, active disease, product or device status, risks and alternatives are reviewed together.
Product or device identity, batch where relevant, treated region, route and observations remain traceable.
Expected reactions, stop criteria, local medical access and the later clinical endpoint are agreed before return travel.
The Doctor Aslan Approach

Product-specific, anatomy-led and reversible in decision-making
The plan names the scar morphology, maturity, cause, functional burden and realistic endpoint. The least burdensome defensible step comes first.
Atrophic, raised, keloid and contracted scars follow different pathways.
Inflammation, tension and ongoing disease are not ignored.
Symptoms, colour, texture and movement are assessed separately.
Improvement may be partial and recurrence or pigment change remains possible.
Frequently Asked Questions
Short and clear
These answers provide general orientation and do not replace personal diagnosis or treatment planning.
Scar Treatment is described on this page as one defined clinical route. Its role, limits and possible alternatives are considered together rather than treating the method name as a personal recommendation.
Suitability depends on the medical question, history, examination, the exact product or device where relevant, realistic aims and an individual benefit–risk assessment.
Diagnosis, definitive suitability, the treatment protocol, product, dose or device settings, expected response and the option not to proceed remain subject to personal medical assessment.
The in-person examination remains the decision point. Expected early reactions, warning signs, the direct contact route, return travel and access to appropriate local medical care are discussed before treatment.
Next Step
Classify the scar · choose one priority · reassess healing